Evaluation of weeds against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in vegetables.
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. University of Agriculture, Peshawar Pakistan
DOI
Abstract
The indiscriminate use of pesticides by small holder farmers under unregistered informal sector in
vegetable farming has culminated in severe environmental pollution, increase in unacceptable percentage of
residue in vegetables and resistance of nematodes to the currently used nematicides. This has prompted the
evaluation of medicinal plants as probable sources of nematicides. A study was conducted in the screenhouse
to evaluate the nematicidal potential of Tridax procumbens and Sida acuta (weeds) on root knot nematodes
Meloidogyne incognita infesting lettuce and carrots. T. procubmens and S. acuta was applied as soil amendment
(400, 600 & 800g) and organic solvent crude extracts (40, 60, 80g/kg soil) in M. incognita infested lettuce
and carrot plants as treatments. Results showed that lettuce and carrot plants grown in pots amended with
the highest quantity of plant materials (800g) had commendatory vegetative growth all through the study
weeks as against the plants treated with organic solvent extracts and the untreated control plants. Vegetative
parameters differ significantly (p<0.05) with increasing quantity of treatment materials applied. Fruit and
head weights in carrots and lettuce at harvest decreased significantly in untreated control plants. T. procumbens
caused significantly more reduction in M. incognita reproduction, with higher yield than S. acuta. This study
demonstrated that T. procumbens and S. acuta though, classified as weeds could be used successfully as soil
amendments in ameliorating the effects of M. incognita infection on vegetables like lettuce and carrots thereby
forestalling environmental pollution
Description
Citation
Fabiyi, O.A. (2022). Evaluation of weeds against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in vegetables. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 38(4):1289-1299.